CRM-M- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 268 Anju and anr State of Haryana and another CORAM: PRESENT: SANJAY VASHISTH 1. the BNSS, 2023, for setting aside the complaint dated Summoning order dated Chief Judicial Magistrate trial for offences under Section with Section 415, 416, 419, 467, 468 and 471 of IPC and Sections 66, 70 of IT Act 2. It has been pointed petitioner Court i.e. Court of Sessions, at approached this Court by way of present petition. 3. observing that in case, petitioner Court of Sessions -49044-2024(O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Anju and anr Versus State of Haryana and another CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH PRESENT: Mr. D.P.S. Bajwa, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Kanwar Sanjiv Kumar, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Adil Singh Boparai, Advocate and Mr. Gulabh S. Bhaika Sidhu, Advocate for respo **** SANJAY VASHISTH, J. (Oral) Petitioners have filed the present petition under Section 528 of the BNSS, 2023, for setting aside the complaint dated Summoning order dated 31.10.2023 (Annexure P Judicial Magistrate, whereby, petitioners have trial for offences under Section 34, 35, 37 of Aadhar Car with Section 415, 416, 419, 467, 468 and 471 of IPC and Sections 66, 70 of It has been pointed out by learned counsel for respondent No.2 that petitioners have not challenged the summoning order i.e. Court of Sessions, at the approached this Court by way of present petition. In view of the above, present petition is disposed of, by observing that in case, petitioners choose Court of Sessions within a period of one month 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-49044-2024(O&M) Decided on : 26.03.2025 . . . Petitioner Versus . . . Respondent HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH , Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Kanwar Sanjiv Kumar, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Adil Singh Boparai, Advocate and Mr. Gulabh S. Bhaika Sidhu, Advocate for respondent No.2. the present petition under Section 528 of the BNSS, 2023, for setting aside the complaint dated 09.03.2022 alongwith (Annexure P-15), passed by learned petitioners have been summoned to face 34, 35, 37 of Aadhar Card Act, 2016 read with Section 415, 416, 419, 467, 468 and 471 of IPC and Sections 66, 70 of out by learned counsel for respondent No.2 that not challenged the summoning order before the Revisional the first instance and have directly approached this Court by way of present petition. the above, present petition is disposed of, by choose to file a revision petition before one month from today, same would be (O&M) .2025 . . . Petitioners . . . Respondents the present petition under Section 528 of alongwith ), passed by learned been summoned to face Act, 2016 read with Section 415, 416, 419, 467, 468 and 471 of IPC and Sections 66, 70 of out by learned counsel for respondent No.2 that the Revisional directly the above, present petition is disposed of, by before from today, same would be RASHMI 2025.03.26 19:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M- decided on merits part, if any, of next three months, by providing adequate opportunity to all the concerned parties. March 26 rashmi Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether Reportable: -49044-2024(O&M) decided on merits by such Revisional Court if any, after examining the complete record, as per law, within a period of next three months, by providing adequate opportunity to all the concerned March 26, 2025 speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No 2 by such Revisional Court without adhering to the delay after examining the complete record, as per law, within a period of next three months, by providing adequate opportunity to all the concerned (SANJAY VASHISTH JUDGE the delay after examining the complete record, as per law, within a period of next three months, by providing adequate opportunity to all the concerned SANJAY VASHISTH) RASHMI 2025.03.26 19:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document