Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 69754 (PNJ)

SUMANPREET KAUR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRWP/6341/2025 · 2025-06-13

To Be Nominated

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[118] Sumanpreet Kaur and another State of Punjab and others Coram : Present: ROHIT KAPOOR [1] there is a threat to the life and liberty of the petitioner [2] 11.06.2025 Superintendent of Police, however, [3] [4] the official respo and waives service. [5] expressing any opinion petitioner respondent No. (Annexure P notified vide [6] 13.06.2025 ‘R. Sharma' IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-6341 Date of Decision : 1 Sumanpreet Kaur and another versus State of Punjab and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHIT KAPOOR Mr. Pardeep Kumar Kapila, Advocate for the **** ROHIT KAPOOR, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner there is a threat to the life and liberty of the petitioner The petitioners have 11.06.2025 (Annexure P-4) to respondent No. Superintendent of Police, District Mansa, Punjab, through an e however, no action has been taken thereupon. Notice of motion. Mr. Ishan Kaushal, learned AAG, Punjab, the official respondents, i.e. respondent Nos.1 to and waives service. Keeping in view the limited prayer made and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the averments made by the petitioners, the instant petition is disposed of with a dir respondent No.2 to decide the representation (Annexure P-4) in pursuance with the Standard Operating Procedures notified vide Notification dated 23.01.2025. Disposed of in the aforesaid terms. .06.2025 Whether speaking/ reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 6341-2025 Date of Decision : 13.06.2025 …Petitioners ….Respondents HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHIT KAPOOR Advocate for the petitioners. Learned counsel for the petitionersinter alia contends that there is a threat to the life and liberty of the petitioners. moved representation dated respondent No.2, i.e. the Senior District Mansa, Punjab, through an e-mail, no action has been taken thereupon. Mr. Ishan Kaushal, learned AAG, Punjab, appears on behalf of ndents, i.e. respondent Nos.1 to 3, on advance notice Keeping in view the limited prayer made and without the merits of the averments made by the , the instant petition is disposed of with a direction to to decide the representation dated 11.06.2025 in pursuance with the Standard Operating Procedures Notification dated 23.01.2025. the aforesaid terms. (ROHIT KAPOOR) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No contends that moved representation dated the Senior mail, appears on behalf of , on advance notice Keeping in view the limited prayer made and without the merits of the averments made by the ection to 11.06.2025 in pursuance with the Standard Operating Procedures RAJNEESH SHARMA 2025.06.13 15:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document