GANESH BHANUDAS SANGLE v. SANTOSH CHANDRABHAN SIRSAT AND ANR
CA/13776/2024 · 2025-01-23
Shri S G Chapalgaonkar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 69750 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 69750 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 70.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 70 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13776 OF 2024 IN FA/2109/2024 GANESH BHANUDAS SANGLE VERSUS SANTOSH CHANDRABHAN SIRSAT AND ANR ... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Sushant Choudhari Advocate for Respondent No. 1 : Mr. M. R. Deshmukh … CORAM : S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J. Dated : January 23, 2025 PER COURT :-
1. Heard Mr. Sushant Chaudhari, learned Advocate appearing for the applicant and Mr. Deshmukh, learned Advocate appearing for respondent no. 1.
2. Learned Advocates appearing for the respective parties submit that the dispute in appeal is as regards to quantum of compensation and parties are exploring possibility of settlement. However, interregnum they agree that the amount of Rs. 8,00,000/- (Rupees eight lakh) be permitted to be withdrawn by the claimant subject to the usual undertaking.
3. Considering the statement as made, the application is partly allowed. At present, applicant is permitted to withdraw Rs. 8,00,000/- (Rupees eight lakh) subject to condition that he furnishes usual undertaking to the Registrar (Judicial) of this 2025:BHC-AUG:2335
2 70.odt Court that in case he required to redeposit the amount, he shall do so within a period of eight weeks.
( S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR ) JUDGE spc-