DINSHAW DABOO LAW COLLEGE THROUGH IN CHARGE PRINCIPAL SHEHNAZ PAURUSH BILLIMORIA v. BAR COUNCIL OF INDIA
SCA/8982/2024 · 2025-12-05
Nirzar S Desai
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6975 (GUJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6975 (GUJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
C/SCA/8294/2024 ORDER DATED: 05/12/2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8294 of 2024 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8295 of 2024 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8296 of 2024 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8510 of 2024 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8937 of 2024 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8951 of 2024 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8982 of 2024 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9029 of 2024 ========================================================== MAHAMANDLESHWAR SHRI KRISHNANANDJI LAW COLLEGE Versus BAR COUNCIL OF INDIA & ORS. ========================================================== Appearance: MR MRUGEN K PUROHIT(1224) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1 MR GH VIRK, GOVERNMENT PLEADER with AGP, Ms. DHARITRI PANCHOLI, for the Respondent(s) No. 5 BHAGIRATH N PATEL(9016) for the Respondent(s) No. 3 MR MANAN A SHAH(5412) for the Respondent(s) No. 1 MR MJ MEHTA(5797) for the Respondent(s) No. 4 MR SAURABH J MEHTA(2170) for the Respondent(s) No. 4 NOTICE SERVED BY DS for the Respondent(s) No. 2,5,6,7 ========================================================== CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NIRZAR S. DESAI
Date : 05/12/2025
COMMON ORAL ORDER
1. Learned Sr. Advocate, Mr. S.I. Nanavati, appearing with learned Advocate, Mr. Purohit, under the instructions, submitted that in view of the fact that all the prayers made in these petitions stand satisfied, by virtue of the interim orders passed in these matters and due to the subsequent
C/SCA/8294/2024 ORDER DATED: 05/12/2025 developments, which have taken place during the pendency of these petitions, the same have become infructuous and accordingly, he seeks permission to withdraw the same with a liberty to file fresh petitions in case of difficulty.
2. Heard. Permission, as prayed for with the liberty as above, is granted. These petitions stand disposed of, as withdrawn. Rule / Notice is discharged. Interim relief, granted earlier, stands vacated. No order as to costs.
(NIRZAR S. DESAI,J) UMESH/- Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge. Digitally signed by: CHAVDA UMESH(HC00203), Principal pvt Secretary, at High Court of Gujarat on 05/12/2025 17:59:40