CRWP-6317-2025 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sr.No.122 CRWP-6317-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 13.06.2025 Mehak Saini and another ...Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE KIRTI SINGH Present:-. Mr. Vimal Kumar Gupta, Advocate for the petitioners. ***** KIRTI SINGH, J.(Oral) This petition has been filed for seeking a direction to the official respondents to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners from the hands of private respondents (arrayed in the petition) as they have solemnized marriage against the wishes of the family members. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are major and have married, against the wishes of respondents No.5 to 7, on 10.06.2025. They have placed on record the marriage certificate (Annexure P-3) and copy of the Aadhar cards (Annexures P-1 and P-2) to substantiate their claim. The petitioners have also submitted a representation dated 10.06.2025 (Annexure P4) to respondent No.2 but till date, no action thereupon has been taken. He further submits that the petitioners will be satisfied if, appropriate direction is given to respondent No.2 to consider and dispose of the aforesaid representation of the petitioners in accordance with law in an expeditious manner. Ramandeep Singh 2025.06.13 12:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-6317-2025 (O&M) 2 3. Notice of motion to the official respondents only. 4. Served with an advance copy of the petition, Mr. Brijesh Sharma, AAG, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of the official respondents and submits that the aforesaid representation will be disposed of in an expeditious manner in accordance with law. 5. Considering the limited request made by learned counsel for the petitioners and keeping in view that the protection of life and liberty is a fundamental right emanating out of Article 21 of the Constitution of India and the scope of the present petition is only regarding protection of life and liberty of the petitioners, this Court is of the opinion that ends of justice would meet if an appropriate direction is issued to the competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representation expeditiously. 6. Accordingly, without commenting on the validity of the marriage allegedly performed by the petitioners and entering upon an exercise to evaluate the evidentiary value of the documents placed on the record, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to decide the representation dated 10.06.2025 (Annexure P4) of the petitioners within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order and grant them protection, if there is any threat to their life and liberty. 7. 7. However, it is made clear that this order may not be construed as expression of an opinion with regard to the age of the petitioners and on legality and validity of the marriage of the petitioners in any civil or criminal proceedings nor the petitioners would be entitled for any protection against Ramandeep Singh 2025.06.13 12:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-6317-2025 (O&M) 3 their arrest or continuance of any criminal proceedings against them, if otherwise, found to be involved in commission of any cognizable offence(s). Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (KIRTI SINGH) JUDGE 13.06.2025 Ramandeep Singh Whether speaking / reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No Ramandeep Singh 2025.06.13 12:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document