Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2025 DAILYLAW 69746 (ORI)

GOKULANANDA SAHOO v. STATE OF ODISHA

WP(C)/28329/2025 · 2025-10-06

Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page 1 of 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No. 28329 of 2025 Gokulananda Sahoo ..... Petitioner Mr. R.K. Sahu, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha & Ors. ..... Opposite Parties Mr. C.K. Pradhan, AGA CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY ORDER 06.10.2025 Order No. 01 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the Opp. Parties. 3. Petitioner has filed the present writ petition inter alia with the following prayer:- “The petitioner therefore pray that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased pleased to admit this Writ Petition, call for records, after hearing the parties, issue writ/writs in the nature of certiorari/ mandamus or any other writ/directions to the statutory authority conduct the enquiry under the provision of O.D. Act and B.D.A's Building Regulation unauthorized pucca construction over the land bearing Khata No. 1593/2490, Plot No. 1074/5413, measuring an area of Ac 0.030 dec Situated in Mouza Bhubaneswar Unit 30, Laxmisagar,-1, And direct to take action against such unauthorized construction as per law, And further be pleased to pass any such order(s) as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the interest of justice. And for this act of kindness the petitioner as in duty bound shall ever pray.” Page 2 of 2. 4. However, taking into account the claim raised in the present Writ Petition, liberty is granted to the Petitioner to make a fresh representation before Opp. Party No.2 by enclosing all the relevant documents and citations in support of his claim, if any, within a period of seven (7) days hence. 5. It is observed that if such representation is filed within the aforesaid time period, Opp. Party No. 2 shall do well to take a lawful decision on the same within a period of three (3) weeks from the date of receipt of such representation. The order so passed by Opp. Party No. 2 be communicated to the Petitioner. 6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. (BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY) Vacation Judge Jyoti