Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
( Sr. No. 113 )
CWP No.17318 of 2025
Date of decision: 01.07.2025
Gursewak Singh .....Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others .....Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI
Present : Mr. Karan Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Shekhar Verma, Addl. A. G., Punjab.
* * *
DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral) (1)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage he would be satisfied if the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3 - Deputy Commissioner, Sangrur to take a decision on the representation dated 29.05.2025 (Annexure P-6) moved by the petitioner. (2)
Learned State counsel, who appears on advance notice, has no objection if the above prayer is accepted. (3)
Accordingly, at this stage, without commenting on the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3 - Deputy Commissioner, Sangrur to take a decision on the aforesaid representation moved by the petitioner, by passing a speaking order and after affording opportunity of hearing to all concerned, preferably within one months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
SUNIL YADAV 2025.07.03 09:25 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order. Chandigarh
CWP No.17318 of 2025
[2]
(4)
Needless to add that the decision so taken be communicated to the petitioner and if the same is not to the satisfaction of the petitioner, he would be at liberty to challenge the same, in accordance with law.
( DEEPAK SIBAL )
JUDGE
01.07.2025
( LAPITA BANERJI ) sunil yadav
JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No
Whether reportable : Yes / No SUNIL YADAV 2025.07.03 09:25 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order. Chandigarh