Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 69721 (PNJ)

HARMESH KUMAR v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRM-M/32618/2025 · 2025-06-17

Sandeep Moudgil

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

127 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-32618-2025 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION : 17.06.2025 HARMESH KUMAR .......PETITIONER(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS .....RESPONDENT(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present: Mr. Rohit Joshi, Advocate for the petitioner(s). (Through Hybrid Mode) Mr. Sandeep Singh, AAG, Punjab. *** SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J.(Oral) This petition has been filed under Section 528 BNSS, 2025 for direction to Respondent No.3 for taking decision on the representation dated 07.05.2025 filed by the petitioner (Annexure P-5) so as to stop the respondent No.4 in interfering in the matter of the petitioner which is already pending before the Lower Court. 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he will be satisfied, in case a direction is issued to respondent No.3-the Senior Superintendent of Police, Roop Nagar to decide the representation dated 07.05.2025 (Annexure P-5) within a time bound manner. Anuradha 2025.06.17 06:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-32618-2025 (O&M) 2 3. Without adverting to the merits of the case, the respondent No.3- the Senior Superintendent of Police, Roop Nagar is directed to consider and decide the representation dated 07.05.2025 (Annexure P-5) by passing a speaking order in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. 4. A copy of order so passed be supplied to the petitioner within seven days thereafter. 5. Petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms. (SANDEEP MOUDGIL) 17.06.2025 JUDGE anuradha Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No Anuradha 2025.06.17 06:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document