Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 69699 (PNJ)

JASJIT SINGH ALIAS ASHU v. STATE OF PUNJAB

CRM-M/32507/2025 · 2025-08-08

N S Shekhawat

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

203 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-32507-2025 Date of Decision:08.08.2025 Jasjit Singh @ Ashu …Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab …Respondent Coram : Hon’ble Mr. Justice N.S.Shekhawat Present : Mr.Karanjeet Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. M.S. Bajwa, DAG, Punjab. Mr. Harjot Singh, Advocate for the complainant. ***** N.S.Shekhawat J. (Oral) 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 482 of B.N.S.S with a prayer to grant anticipatory bail to him in case FIR No.82, dated 07.05.2025, under Sections 115(2),118,126(2),351(2),3(5) of B.N.S, registered at Police Station Mukerian, District Hoshiarpur (Annexure P-1). 2. While granting the concession of interim anticipatory bail by this Court on 16.06.2025, the following contentions were noticed by this Court and the same has been reproduced below:- “The learned counsel representing the petitioner inter-alia contends that the allegations made in the FIR are not supported by the medical evidence and there is a delay of 5 days in registration of the FIR. He further submitted that the petition for evicting the first informant's father and an injunction suit filed by the petitioner's father are pending in the court”. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has reiterated the submissions and further submits that in compliance of the order dated 16.06.2025 passed by HITESH 2025.08.08 16:37 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/judgment High Court, Chandigarh CRM-M-32507-2025 -2 a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, the petitioner has joined the investigation. 4. Learned State counsel also submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation and is no longer required for further investigation. 5. On the other hand learned counsel for the complainant has vehemently opposed the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner. 6. In view of the above statement made by learned counsel for the parties, the interim order dated 16.06.2025 is made absolute. The petitioner shall continue to join the investigation, as and when called by the Investigating Officer. The petitioner shall also abide by the conditions as specified under Section 482 (2) of B.N.S.S alongwith the following other conditions:- (i) The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case, so as to dissuade him to disclose such facts to the Court or to any other authority. (ii) The petitioner shall surrender his passport, if any, (if already not surrendered), and in case he is not holder of the same, he shall swear an affidavit to that effect. (iii) The petitioner shall also file his affidavit before the concerned I.O./Arresting Officer, mentioning his ordinary place of residence and number of mobile phone, which shall be used by him during the pendency of the case. In case of change of place of residence/mobile number, he shall share the details with the concerned Investigating Officer. (iv) In case, the petitioner involve in any other criminal activity, during the pendency of the case, it shall be viewed seriously and the prosecution shall be at liberty to move a petition for cancellation of bail granted to him. (N.S.SHEKHAWAT) 08.08.2025 JUDGE hitesh Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No HITESH 2025.08.08 16:37 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/judgment High Court, Chandigarh