Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 69672 (PNJ)

DARSHNA DEVI AND OTHERS v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRWP/6383/2025 · 2025-07-04

Sandeep Moudgil

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

116+235 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-W-924-2025 in/and CRWP-6383-2025 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION : 04.07.2025 DARSHNA DEVI AND OTHERS .......PETITIONER(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS .....RESPONDENT(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present: Mr. Vishal Tartyal, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mr. Sandeep Singh, AAG, Punjab. Mr. Rohit Sapehiya, Advocate for Mr. R.S. Chauhan, Advocate for respondents No. 5 to 10. *** SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J.(Oral) CRM-W-924-2025 This application has been filed for placing on record relevant annexures i.e. Annexures 5 and 6. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed and above said documents i.e. Annexures 5 and 6 are taken on record. Main case This petition has been filed for issuance of a writ, order, or direction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 528 of the B.N.S.S., 2023 directing Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 Anuradha 2025.07.07 22:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-W-924-2025 in/and 2 CRWP-6383-2025 (O&M) to provide adequate police protection to safeguard the Petitioners' life and personal liberty by considering their representation dated 17.05.2025 (Annexure P-3) and to consider the representation dated 30.04.2025 (Annexure P-1) & 09.05.2025 (Annexure P-2) and take action as per the law against the Respondent No. 5 to 10. 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he will be satisfied, in case a direction is issued to respondent No.2-the Senior Superintendent of Police, Pathankot to decide the representation dated 17.05.2025 (Annexure P-3) and representation dated 25.04.2025 (Annexure P-1) & 09.05.2025 (Annexure P-2) within a time bound manner. 3. Without adverting to the merits of the case, the respondent No.2- the Senior Superintendent of Police, Pathankot is directed to consider and decide the representation dated 17.05.2025 (Annexure P- 3) and representation dated 25.04.2025 (Annexure P-1) & 09.05.2025 (Annexure P-2) after providing opportunity of hearing to them by passing a speaking order in accordance with law within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. 4. A copy of order so passed be supplied to the petitioner within one week thereafter. 5. Petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms. (SANDEEP MOUDGIL) 04.07.2025 JUDGE anuradha Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No Anuradha 2025.07.07 22:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document