HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 24337 of 2025 Court No. - 66 HON'BLE ASHUTOSH SRIVASTAVA, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Ajay Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State-respondents and perused the record. This bail application under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been moved on behalf of accused-applicant, Bablu, seeking enlargement on bail in Case Crime No. 646 of 2024, under Sections 103 (1), 191 (2), 352, 115 (2), 190, 351 (3) B.N.S., Police Station-Ghatampur, District-Kanpur nagar. Learned counsel for the applicant argued that the accused-applicant is innocent. He has been falsely implicated in this very case crime number and is languishing in jail since 02.06.2025. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that First Information Report was lodged on 28.11.2024, against xis named and two unknown persons, including the applicant, with the allegation that on the date of incident all the accused persons hurled abuses and severely beaten the son of the first informant namely Lala Singh, and on the instigation of one Murari Parihar, owner of the truck, his brother in law has mounted the loader on the son of the first informant namely Lala Singh, due to which he sustained severe injuries and later on the injured died. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that only general role has been assigned to the applicant and there is no specific allegation has been levelled against the applicant. Criminal history of one case has been explained in paragraph no. 15 of the affidavit filed in support of bail applicant and there is no likelihood of his fleeing from course of justice or tampering with evidence in case of release on bail. Hence, bail has been prayed for. Per contra learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail of the applicant, but submits that similarly circumstanced aforesaid co-accused has already been granted bail by this Court. Considering all above facts and circumstances, the nature of accusations, Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ashutosh Kumar, Jai Prakash Prasad Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Bablu .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) severity of the punishment in the case of conviction and nature of supporting evidence, reasonable apprehension of tampering with the witness and prima facie case, but without commenting on merit of case, a case for bail is made out. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. Let the accused-applicant, Bablu, involved in above mentioned case crime number be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and two reliable sureties each, in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant will not tamper with the evidence. 2. The applicant will not indulge in any criminal activity. 3. The applicant will not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witnesses and co-operate in the trial. 4. The applicant will appear regularly on each and every date fixed by the trial court, unless his personal appearance is exempted through counsel by the court concerned. In the event of breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the court below will be at liberty to proceed to cancel his bail. September 11, 2025 Deepak/ BAIL No. 24337 of 2025 2 (Ashutosh Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- DEEPAK KUMAR KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad