IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CMPMO No. 48 of 2021 Decided on: 18.06.2025 ____________________________________________________ Arun Kumar and others ……….. petitioners Versus Jeevan Khanna and others ……….respondents ____________________________________________________ Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander Negi, Judge Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the petitioners : Ms. Dhanvanti, Advocate vice Mr. Sanjay Bhardwaj, Advocate, for petitioners No. 1 & 2. : Mr. Anuj Gupta, Advocate, for petitioners No. 3 & 4. For the respondents : Mr. Rohit, Advocate, vice Mr. Sumit Sood, Advocate. ____________________________________________________ Bipin Chander Negi, Judge (oral) Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the present petition has been rendered infructuous on account of subsequent developments. 2. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (Bipin Chander Negi) Judge June 18, 2025 tarun 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?