Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6966 (AP)

RALLAPALLE RAVI KUMAR v. STATE OF AP

CRLP/1212/2021 · 2025-07-24

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010067472021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 1212/2021 Between: 1. RALLAPALLE RAVI KUMAR, S/O. VENKATASUBBAIAH, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/O. THAMBABAVI STREET, PORUMAMILLA VILLAGE AND MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 2. AKKIDASARI RAMANA,, S/O. PULLAIAH, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, R/O. RAMAIPALLE VILLAGE, PORUMAMILLA MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 3. THIMMANAPALLE SIVAIAH,, S/O. MAHANANDI, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, YERRASALA VILLAGE, ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND 1. STATE OF AP, REP. BY THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PORUMAMILLA POLICE STATION, REP. BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI. 2. RUDRAVARAM NAGENDRA PRASAD, S/O. NAGABUSHANAM, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/O. RAGHAVENDRA NAGAR, PORUMAMILLA MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S): 1. S DILIP JAYA RAM Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 2 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 1212/2021 ORDER: The instant criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short ‘Cr.P.C)/under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’) has been filed by the Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 to 3, seeking quashment of the proceedings pending against them in Crime No.22 of 2021 of Porumamilla Police Station, YSR Kadapa District, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 427 r/w 34 of IPC. 2. Heard Sri S.Dilip Jaya Ram, learned counsel for the Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 to 3 and Ms.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor on behalf of the State. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petition may be disposed of, without causing any prejudice to the rights and contentions of the petitioners. 4. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor on behalf of the State would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. 5. Considering the submissions made, the Criminal Petition is disposed of, without causing any prejudice to the rights and contentions of the petitioners. However, the police are directed to conclude the investigation and file a report within a period of two (2) months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 4 As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 25.07.2025 UPS 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 1212/2021 Dated.25.07.2025 UPS 237