HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 22788 of 2025 Court No. - 77 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for applicant and learned AGA for State. 2. Present application has been preferred with prayer to quash the summoning order dated 14.10.2024 passed by learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court no. 2, Bijnor in Criminal Case no. 4005 of 2024 (State vs. Ranvir Singh @ Ranveer Singh) arising out of Case Crime no. 357 of 2022 under Section 409 IPC, PS- Najibabad, District Bijnor. Prayer has also been made to quash the charge sheet dated 30.6.2023 against the applicant in Case Crime no. 357 of 2022. 3. While assailing entire proceeding in shape of charge sheet and cognizance order, it is contended by learned counsel for applicant that applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. Present criminal proceeding has been initiated on false and fabricated complaint of one student. No illegal demand has been raised from the student who made complaint in the present case. No case is made out against the applicant, since there is no criminal breach of trust, hence the entire proceeding is liable to be set aside. 4. Per contra, learned AGA vehemently opposed the prayer sought through instant application. 5. After hearing the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties and upon perusal of the record, it is observed that prima facie it cannot be said that no offence is made out against the applicant. Matter pertains to Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rohit Kumar Singh, Surendra Kumar Sharma Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ranvir Singh Alias Ranveer Singh .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) embezzlement of scholarship hence, the assertions of false implication raised by the applicant are factual issues that requires proper adjudication by the trial court based on evidence and cannot be conclusively determined in proceedings under Section 528 BNSS. In proceeding u/s 528 BNSS, this Court is not inclined to hold mini-trial. 6. It is well settled that the inherent powers under Section 528 BNSS are to be exercised sparingly and with caution, primarily to prevent abuse of the process of the court or to secure the ends of justice. In the instant case, no sufficient ground have been made out to invoke the extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Section 528 BNSS. 7. In view of the foregoing, the application under Section 528 BNSS is devoid of merits and is accordingly dismissed. October 8, 2025 Shaswat NA528 No. 22788 of 2025 2 (Saurabh Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHASWAT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad