Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:110886 Court No. - 64 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 23970 of 2025 Applicant :- Golu @ Prince Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Anita Singh,Kumari Poonam Rajpoot,Prem Babu Verma Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Samit Gopal,J. 1. List revised. 2. Heard Ms. Anita Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Ajay Singh, learned A.G.A.-I for the State and perused the material on record. 3. This bail application under Section 483 of B.N.S.S., 2023 has been filed by the applicant- Golu @ Prince, seeking enlargement on bail during trial in connection with Case Crime No. 145 of 2025, under Sections 87, 64, 127(2) B.N.S., Police Station Kishni, District Mainpuri. 4. The first information report of the present matter was lodged on 07.05.2025 by Smt. Sunita Devi against the applicant and 01 unknown person alleging therein that her daughter aged about 16 years was lured and enticed away by the applicant and one other person on 30.04.2025 at about 3.30 am. She was then locked in a room and on threat by a country-made pistol raped many times. On 04.05.2025 she went to the police station to lodge a report but the report was not lodged. She is now giving a report to the Superintendent of Police on the basis of which the present first information report has been lodged. 5. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is submitted that the first information report has been lodged after 07 days of the incident for which there is no plausible explanation. It is submitted that the victim is a major girl. The applicant has no criminal history as stated in para 21 and is in jail since 08.05.2025. 6. Per contra, learned counsel for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that in so far delay in first information report is concerned, the first informant herself in first information report has stated that she went to the police station on 04.05.2025 for lodging a report but the same was not lodged and then she moved an application before the Superintendent of Police on the basis of which the present first information report has been lodged. It is submitted that the same thus is reasonable explanation. It is submitted that in so far as role of the applicant is concerned, the same is consistent throughout in the first information report and in the statements of the victim recorded during investigation wherein he has been alleged to have raped the victim after confining her in a room on threat of country- made pistol. It is submitted that as such the bail application be rejected. 7. After having heard learned counsel for the parties and perusing the record, it is evident that in so far delay in first information report is concerned, the same is explained by the first informant itself in the first information report. The role of the applicant is consistent. 8. Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court does not find it a fit case for bail, hence, the bail application is rejected. 9. Pending application (s), if any, shall stand disposed of. Order Date :- 11.7.2025 AS Rathore (Samit Gopal,J.) Digitally signed by :- ABHISHEK SINGH RATHOR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad