Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 69650 (ALL)

VIRANDER AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

NA528/23063/2025 · 2025-07-09

Raj Beer Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:111990 Court No. - 71 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 23063 of 2025 Applicant :- Virander And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Rajesh Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- Dhananjay Kumar,G.A. Hon'ble Raj Beer Singh,J. 1. Vakalatnama filed on behalf of opposite party no.2 is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. This application u/s 528 BNSS has been filed with the following prayer :- "It is, therefore most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to allow this application and set aside the entire criminal proceeding of Case No. 610 of 2012 (State v. Virander and others) as well as impugned cognizance order dated 05.04.2013 arising out of Charge-sheet No. 07/2012 dated 06.07.2012 having N.C.R. No. 36/2012, under Sections 323, 504, 506 I.P.C., Police Station- Shahganj, District- Agra, pending before learned Special Chief Judicial Magistrate, Agra, on the basis of compromise held between the parties." 4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicants that applicants are facing trial for offences under Sections 323, 504, 506 of IPC and during pendency of the case both the parties have amicably settled the dispute and compromised the case. Both the parties have already filed compromise before the trial court concerned. Referring to facts of the matter, it was submitted that the impugned proceedings may be quashed on the basis of compromise between the parties. 5. Learned A.G.A. and learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 have no objection if parties compromise the matter. 6. I have considered the submissions and perused the record. 7. In the instant matter, it appears from record that applicants are facing trial for offences under Sections 323, 504, 506 of IPC and now both the parties have compromised the case. It was shown that compromise has already been filed before the court concerned. The alleged offences are compoundable and thus, the matter can be decided by the trial court concerned itself. 8. In view of the aforesaid, the trial court concerned is hereby directed to pass an appropriate order on the basis of compromise filed by the parties, in accordance with law, expeditiously preferably within a period of two months from today. 9. With the aforesaid observation, this application u/s 528 BNSS is disposed of. Order Date :- 10.7.2025 Rama Kant Digitally signed by :- RAMA KANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad