1 2025:CGHC:6338 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRCA No. 191 of 2025 Mansur Ansari S/o Shri Yusuf Ansari Aged About 26 Years Caste Musalman, R/o. Village Daleli, Police Station Medal, District Garhwa (Jharkhand) ... Applicant versus State of Chhattisgarh Through Police Station Surajpur, District - Surajpur (C.G.) ... Non-Applicant For Applicant : Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Advocate. For Non-Applicant/State : Ms. Supriya Upasane, Govt. Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Order On Board 04.02.2025 1. The applicant has preferred this application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’), for grant of anticipatory bail, apprehending his arrest in connection with Crime No. 316/2023, registered at Police Station Surajpur, District - Surajpur (C.G.) for alleged commission of offence punishable under Section 21 (C) and 29 of NDPS Act. 2. According to the prosecution's story, it was alleged that the Police of Police Station Surajpur, District Surajpur had received a secret information on 21.07.2023 that the Hundai Car No. JH01/FA/2070 is smuggling / transporting illegal intoxicating injection for its disposal and PREETI KUMARI Digitally signed by PREETI KUMARI Date: 2025.02.05 14:31:41 +0530 2 stayed in Pachira panchwati Dhaba. On the basis of report, the Police team and made raid and seized T GESIC Injection 45 packet (Total 450 No.), Avil Injection 100 No. from the present applicant, T GESIC Injection 300 No. and Avil Injection 100 No. from Abdul Ansari. After completing the formalities the prosecution agencies have filed the challan before the learned Special Court, Surajpur, declared the applicant being absconded. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case and he has not committed any offence. He further submits that the present applicant is a 26 years old and he was not involved in the said crime despite of that the prosecution has added the name of the present applicant in the said crime, therefore, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the applicant. 4. On the other hand learned State counsel opposes the application for grant of anticipatory bail to the applicant. 5. Recently the Supreme Court in the matter of Anarul SK v. The State of West Bengal {SLP (Crl.) No(s). 12621/2024 has observed that the grant of anticipatory bail in cases involving Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) is a very serious issue. 6. In the light of observation made by the Supreme Court in Anarul SK (supra), I do not find any good ground to entertain this anticipatory bail application. Accordingly, the present anticipatory bail application is dismissed. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Preeti