Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 69638 (PNJ)

DEEPIKA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CRWP/6387/2025 · 2025-07-28

Jasjit Singh Bedi

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRWP-6387-2025 (O & M) ::1:: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (242) CRWP-6387-2025 (O & M) Date of decision: 28.07.2025 Deepika and anr. …... Petitioner(s) V/s State of Haryana and ors. ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present: Mr. Bharat Pilania, Advocate, for Mr. Parveen, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. T.P. Singh, Sr. DAG, Haryana. Mr. Sudhir Hooda, Advocate, for respondent No.6. **** JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J. (Oral) The prayer in the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is for issuance of a writ in the nature of Mandamus seeking directions to the official respondents to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners. 2. The learned counsel for the State on instructions from ASI Subhash submits that the proceedings under Sections 107 and 151 of Cr.P.C. (i.e. Sections 126 and 170 of BNSS) stand initiated against respondent No.7/Vaibhav Khundiya. 3. In view of the above, no further orders are required to be passed. SUKHPREET KAUR 2025.07.29 21:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh CRWP-6387-2025 (O & M) ::2:: 4. The present petition stands disposed of. 5. However, the parties are at liberty to avail their remedies in accordance with law. July 28, 2025 ( JASJIT SINGH BEDI) sukhpreet JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No SUKHPREET KAUR 2025.07.29 21:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh