P.C.Vedavalli and Another v. P.C. Chandra (Deceased) P.C.Muralidharan
A/3648/2025 · 2025-07-30
C V Karthikeyan
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 69631 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 69631 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
A.No.3648 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 30-07-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE C.V. KARTHIKEYAN A.No.3648 of 2025 in T.O.S.No.82 of 2024 P.C.Vedavalli and Another, W/o.M.P.Dwarka Naryanan (Late), No.Old 20/24, Bharathi Road, Patel Apartments, Perambur, Chennai - 600 011. Applicant(s) Vs P.C. Chandra (Deceased) P.C.Muralidharan S/o.Chinni Krishnan, 9/5, Sandhiyappan Main Road, Otteri, Perambur Barracks, Chennai - 600
012. and another Respondent(s) For Applicant(s): Mr.C.K. Suresh For Respondent(s): Mr.T.Arul
ORDER This application has been field by the defendants in Testamentary Original Suit seeking to set aside the order dated 02.06.2025 by which
order they were set exparte.
2. In the affidavit filed in support of the Judges Summons, it had been contended that the suit was listed for filing written statement. But C.V. KARTHIKEYAN,J., 1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
A.No.3648 of 2025 vum instructions had not been given to the counsel and there was a communication gap. It had been stated that however written statement had now been filed along with the application. Since bonafide had been expressed by filing written statement and also on hearing the learned counsel for the plaintiffs, the application stands allowed. The exparte
order, dated 02.06.2025 is set aside. 30-07-2025 (½) vum A.No.3648 of 2025 in T.O.S.No.82 of 2024 2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis