Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 69616 (BOM)

THE ADMINISTRATOR, CITY AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. WALUJ ABD v. SUDHAKAR S/O HARIBHAU MULEY AND ANOTHER

CA/10910/2025 · 2025-12-18

Shri Sanjay A Deshmukh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CA.10910.25.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10910 OF 2025 IN RAST/28961/2025 THE ADMINISTRATOR, CITY AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. WALUJ AURANGABAD VERSUS SUDHAKAR S/O HARIBHAU MULEY AND ANOTHER ... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Shambhuraje V. Deshmukh. Adv. for Respondent No.1 : Mr. G. K. Naik Thigle, h/f Mr. Tejas C. Sonawane. AGP for Respondent No.2 / State : Mr. D. J. Patil. ... CORAM : SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. DATE : 18th December, 2025. Order: 1 This is an application for condonation of delay of 148 days caused in filing the review application. 2 Perused the application and the affidavit-in-reply filed by respondent No.1 / claimant. 3 Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 4 The learned counsel for respondent No.1 / claimant strongly opposed the application and submitted that there is no sufficient reason to condone the delay. 2025:BHC-AUG:37650 2 CA.10910.25.odt 5 On perusal of the application, it appears that the delay has been caused on account of obtaining the certified copies and instructions for preparation of the review application. It further appears that the delay has not been deliberately caused. Therefore, in the interest of justice, the delay deserves to be condoned. 6 For the reasons stated in the application, the delay stands condoned. The application stands allowed in the interest of justice. [ SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. ] nga