Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 69615 (BOM)

RAOSAHEB BABURAO PAWAR DIED THR LRS SURESH RAOSAHEB PAWAR AND ORS v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. COLLECTOR OSMANABAD AND ORS.

CA/9835/2025 · 2025-11-26

Shri Shailesh P Brahme

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

24 25 CA 9827 25.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 24 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9827 OF 2025 IN FAST/24357/2025 DNYANDEV BHAGWAN PAWAR VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. COLLECTOR OSMANABAD AND ORS. ... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Ingale Vivekanand V. AGP for Respondent nos.1 & 2 : Mr. S.V. Hange … 25 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9835 OF 2025 IN FAST/24368/2025 RAOSAHEB BABURAO PAWAR DIED THR LRS SURESH RAOSAHEB PAWAR AND ORS VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. COLLECTOR OSMANABAD AND ORS. ... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Ingale Vivekanand V. AGP for Respondent nos.1 & 2 : Mr. S.V. Hange ... CORAM : SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J. DATE : 26.11.2025 PER COURT : None appears for respondent no. 3. Learned A.G.P. appears for respondent nos. 1 and 2 and contest the applications. 2. For the reasons stated in the application, delay of 2447 days is sought to be condoned. The pleadings of the applications have not been traversed. I find no mala fides on the part of the applicants. A case is made out for condonation of delay on certain conditions. 3. The delay stands condoned subject to condition that the applicants 1/2 2025:BHC-AUG:32973 24 25 CA 9827 25.odt shall not be entitled to claim interest and statutory benefits for the delayed period. 4. The Civil Applications are disposed of. ( SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.) mkd/- 2/2