Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 69611 (BOM)

PATHAN SHAHRUKHKHAN MURADKHAN v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS

WP/13488/2025 · 2025-11-13

Shri Hiten S Venegavkar, Smt Vibha Kankanwadi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 wp 13488.25.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 945 WRIT PETITION NO.13488 OF 2025 Pathan Shahrukhkhan Muradkhan VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra Through It’s Secretary And Others ... Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. S.B. Solanke AGP for Respondents : Mr. R.B. Dhavare CORAM : SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI & HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, JJ. Dated : November 13, 2025 PER COURT :- 1. Heard. Leave to amend the prayer clause. Amendment to be carried out forthwith. 2. Present petition has been filed to direct the respondent no.2-Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Beed to consider and decide the proposal dated 26.5.2025. 3. Learned A.G.P. waives notice for respondents No.1 to 3 and, upon, instructions, makes a statement that, the respondent no.2 would decide the said proposal within a period of Four (4) weeks from today. Said statement is taken as an undertaking. 2025:BHC-AUG:31521-DB 2 wp 13488.25.odt 4. We dispose off the Writ Petition by directing Respondent no.2 to decide the proposal dated 26.5.2025 within a period of Four (4) weeks from today. ( HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J. ) ( SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI, J. ) … AAA/-