106+267 107+268 1. M/S FIORI CREATIONS PVT LTD PRESIDING OFFICER COURT- 2. M/S FIORI CREATIONS PVT LTD PRESIDING OFFICER , INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNALCUM COURT- CORAM: Present: HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) CM-9799 affidavit under Section 17 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision : 15 CM-9799 CWP-16614 of 2023 M/S FIORI CREATIONS PVT LTD. VERSUS PRESIDING OFFICER , INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNALCUM -1, FARIDABAD AND ANR. CM-9750 CWP-16615 M/S FIORI CREATIONS PVT LTD. VERSUS PRESIDING OFFICER , INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNALCUM -1, FARIDABAD AND ANR. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI None for the petitioner(s). Mr. Anshul Sharma, Advocate for the applicant-respondent *** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) 9799-CWP-2025 and CM-9750-CWP These are applications for placing on record copy of reply and affidavit under Section 17-B of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision : 15-07-2025 9799-CWP-2025 in/and 16614 of 2023(O&M) ........Petitioner(s) VERSUS , INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNALCUM-LABOUR ........Respondent(s) 9750-CWP-2025 in/and 16615-2023 (O&M) ........Petitioner(s) VERSUS PRESIDING OFFICER , INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNALCUM-LABOUR ........Respondent(s) HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Advocate No.2. HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) CWP-2025 are applications for placing on record copy of reply and of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. ........Petitioner(s) LABOUR ........Respondent(s) LABOUR ........Respondent(s) HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI are applications for placing on record copy of reply and SAPNA GOYAL 2025.07.16 11:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CM-9799-CWP-2025 in/and CWP-16614 of 2023(O&M) and other connected case -2- Keeping in view the contents mentioned in the application(s), the same is allowed. Copy of reply and affidavit are taken on record subject to all just exceptions. CWP-16614 of 2023(O&M) and CWP-16615-2023 (O&M) 1. Present are the set of two writ petitions, the details of which are mentioned in the heading involve common question of law in the context of common set of facts and thus they are being decided by a common order. 2. On the last date of hearing, no one had appeared on behalf of the petitioner. Today again, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, it can be safely presumed that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the present writ petitions. 3. Dismissed for non-prosecution. 4. Any civil miscellaneous application pending if any, also stands disposed of. 5. Photocopy of this order be placed on the file of other connected case. 15-07-2025 Sapna Goyal (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE NOTE: Whether speaking; YES Whether reportable: sNO SAPNA GOYAL 2025.07.16 11:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document