[2025:RJ-JP:10695] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2229/2025 Sardar Meena S/o Mangal Ram Meena, Aged About 46 Years, R/o Jat Mohalla, Kanwada, Police Station Laxmangarh, District Alwar (Rajasthan) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Girish Khandelwal, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, GA-cum-AAG with Mr. Manvendra Singh, PP Mr. Shahjad Khan, ASI, Police Station Lakshmangarh Alwar HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 10/03/2025 1. Apprehending his arrest in connection with FIR No.176/2024, registered at Police Station Laxmangarh, District Alwar, for the offence(s) under Section 380 of IPC, the accused-petitioner has preferred this criminal misc. bail application under Section 482 of B.N.S.S. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has falsely been implicated for the offence under Section 411 of IPC. Prima-facie no case is made out against the petitioner. The petitioner appeared before the concerned Investigating Officer, pursuant to the directions issued by this Court on 14.02.2025, custodial investigation of the petitioner is not required, the stolen articles have already been recovered from the possession of the other co-accused, therefore, the anticipatory bail application of the petitioner may be allowed. [2025:RJ-JP:10695] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-2229/2025] 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the grant of anticipatory bail application and submitted the factual report, the same is taken on record. It is informed by learned Public Prosecutor that in pursuant to the directions dated 27.02.2025, the Investigating Officer Mr. Shahjad Khan is present in person. 4. It is stated by the Investigating Officer that disclosure statement of the petitioner was recorded on 19.02.2025 and after investigation it was found that the petitioner received stolen articles from the other co-accused, the other co-accused has named the present petitioner. The petitioner has not submitted any stolen articles before him, custodial investigation of the petitioner is required, the petitioner was also found to be involved in another criminal matter pertaining to year 2002 for the offences under Sections 323, 341, 324, 326 and 34 of IPC. Apart from that case 2 FIRs were also registered separately for the offences under Sections 457, 380 and 411 of IPC, in those cases also the petitioner is required, therefore, the instant anticipatory bail application of the petitioner may be dismissed. 5. Heard and perused the material available on record. 6. The investigation reveals that the custodial investigation of the petitioner is required, the petitioner has not submitted any stolen articles before the concerned Investigating Officer, therefore, the instant anticipatory bail application of the accused- petitioner is hereby dismissed. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Ashwani Kr Srivastava /-11