ARURU SARATH KUMAR @ SARATH RAYUDU v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
CRLP/1416/2025 · 2025-04-21
T Mallikarjuna Rao
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6958 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6958 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010066102025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3369] MONDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 1416/2025 Between: Aruru Sarath Kumar @ Sarath Rayudu ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT Counsel for the Petitioner/accused:
1. RAYALCHERUVU ABISHEK REDDY Counsel for the Respondent/complainant:
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following Order: [[ This Criminal Petition has been filed by the petitioner/A12, seeking anticipatory bail, in connection with Crime No.103 of 2024 of Chandragiri Urban Police Station, Tirupathi District. 2. A case has been registered against the petitioner herein and others for the offences punishable under Sections 109, 143, 147, 427, 307, 324 and 452 read with 149 IPC. 3. Heard. Perused the record. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that this Court in Crl.P.No.3166 of 2024, vide order, dated 23.05.2024 granted bail to A8 and A10 on the ground that there are no allegations perse against the petitioners therein/A8 and A10 and
2
there are no previous antecedents against them. The case of the present petitioner herein i.e. A12 is also on the same footing as that of A8 and A10. He further submitted that accused Nos.1, 2, 3, 4 and 13 had obtained anticipatory bail by the learned X Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tirupati. On the other hand, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor has not disputed the said submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 5. Considering the submissions made and since the case of the petitioner herein/A12 is also on the same footing as that of A8 and A10 who were already granted anticipatory bail by this Court, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner herein/A12, on the following conditions. 6. Accordingly, The Criminal Petition is allowed. The petitioner herein is directed to be enlarged on bail in the event of his arrest and his executing personal bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the Station House Officer, Chandragiri Urban Police Station, Chandragiri, Tirupati District.
In addition, the petitioner shall abide the following conditions:
i) The petitioner shall appear before the Station House Officer, Chandragiri Urban Police Station, Chandragiri, Tirupati District, twice a week on every Monday and Thursday at 10.00
3
A.M till the investigation is completed or two (2) months from the date of this order or whichever is earlier;
ii) The petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation; and
iii). He shall not tamper the evidence or threaten the witnesses in any way. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, in this Criminal Petition shall stand closed _____________________ T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO, J 21.04.2025 ASR
4
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO
Criminal Petition No.1416 of 2025
Dated:21.04.2025
ASR