Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 69571 (ALL)

MADHUR v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/23111/2025 · 2025-07-10

Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:111164 Court No. - 68 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 23111 of 2025 Applicant :- Madhur Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Adesh Kumar,Barkha Chaudhary Counsel for Opposite Party :- Dhirpal Singh,G.A.,Rahul Kumar Tyagi Hon'ble Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J. 1. Heard Sri Adesh Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Rahul Kumar Tyagi, learned counsel for the informant and Sri learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The instant bail application has been filed with a prayer to release the applicant on bail in Case Crime No.211 of 2025, under Sections-191(2), 191(3), 109(1), 115(2), 117(2), 118(1), 352, 61(2) of BNS, Police Station- Partapur, District-Meerut, during the pendency of the trial. 3. Contention of learned counsel for the applicant is that no specific role was assigned to the applicant in the first information report regarding beating to any of the injured but subsequently in the statement of first informant/injured (Komal), the role of causing injuries at her leg has been assigned which is non-vital part and there is serious contradiction in the statement of both the injured witnesses regarding roles of the accused persons. It is further submitted that accused and the victims belong to the same family and dispute is over a house. It is further submitted that applicant is in jail since 25.05.2025. In case, he is granted bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and would cooperate in the trial proceedings. 4. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid facts. 5. Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the nature of offence, evidence, complicity of accused and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. 6. Let the applicant- Madhur involved in the aforementioned crime be released on bail, on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned, with the following conditions:- i. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. ii. The applicant shall cooperate in the trial/investigation sincerely without seeking any adjournment. iii. The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail. iv. The applicant shall attend in accordance with the conditions of the bond executed by him. 7. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. 8. Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted. Order Date :- 11.7.2025 S.Chaurasia Digitally signed by :- SHUBHAM CHAURASIA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad