Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6957 (AP)

Arella Bala Linganna v. Arella Linganna

SA/157/2004 · 2025-01-23

T Mallikarjuna Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010067702004 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3369] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO SECOND APPEAL NO: 157/2004 Between: 1. ARELLA BALA LINGANNA, S/O.LINGANNA AGRICULTURIST R/O.PEDDA DEVALAPURAM (V), BANDI ATMAKUR(M), NANDYAL TALUK, ...APPELLANT AND 1. ARELLA LINGANNA, S/O.LINGANNA AGRICULTURIST R/O.PEDDA DEVALAPURAM (V), BANDI ATMAKUR(M), NANDYAL TALUK, 2. SUGALI CHINNA NARAYANA NAYAK, S/O.VENKATESHAM CULTIVATORS R/O.PEDDA DEVALAPURAM (V), BANDI ATMAKUR(M), NANDYAL TALUK, 3. SUGALI NARAYANA NAYAK, S/O.CHINNA JAMBULAIAH CULTIVATORS R/O.PEDDA DEVALAPURAM (V), BANDI ATMAKUR(M), NANDYAL TALUK, 4. SUGALI RAMA NAYAK, S/O.CHINNA VENKATESAM CULTIVATORS R/O.PEDDA DEVALAPURAM (V), BANDI ATMAKUR(M), NANDYAL TALUK, ...RESPONDENT(S): THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING JUDGMENT: The Second Appeal is preferred by the appellant against the Judgment and Decree dated 29.10.2003, passed in A.S.No.51 of 1996, on the file of the learned Additional Senior Civil Judge, Nandyal. 2. None appeared for the appellant. Learned counsel for the respondents is present. 3. On 10.12.2024, On being represented by learned counsel for the appellant that he has given up vakalat, this Court ordered the Registry to issue notice to the appellant, but the same was returned un-served with an endorsement ‘Died’. 4. On 08.01.2025 Sri M.R.S.Srinivas, learned counsel, submitted that he was going to file vakalat on behalf of the appellant and sought time. 5. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, it is brought to the notice of this Court that no vakalat has been filed on behalf of the appellant. 6. In view of the death of the appellant, the Second Appeal is dismissed as abated. There shall be no order as to costs. Interim orders granted earlier, if any, shall stand vacated. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this appeal shall stand closed. ________________________ T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO, J Date: 23.01.2025 M K K