Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 69555 (KAR)

HEMANTHA GOWDA v. SMT ASHWINI Y V

RPFC/206/2023 · 2025-07-21

Lalitha Kanneganti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27664 RPFC No. 206 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI REV.PET FAMILY COURT NO. 206 OF 2023 BETWEEN: HEMANTHA GOWDA AGED 30 YEARS, S/O NANJE GOWDA, R/O MUTTUGADALU, AREHALLI HOBLI, IRAVALLI POST, BELUR TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT-573 115. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. ANANTHA NARAYANA B.N., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: 1. SMT. ASHWINI Y.V. AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, W/O HEMANTH GOWDA, 2. ARNA AGED ABOUT 04 YEARS, D/O HEMANTHA GOWDA, SINCE MINOR, REPRESENTED BY HIS MOTHER AS NATURAL GUARDIAN, SMT. ASHWINI Y.V., 1 & 2 BOTH ARE RESIDENTS OF MALALUR VILLAGE AND POST, CHIKKAMAGALURU TALUK, CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT-577 101. …RESPONDENTS (R2 IS MINOR REPRESENTED BY R1) Digitally signed by LAKSHMI T Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27664 RPFC No. 206 of 2023 THIS RPFC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 19(4) OF FAMILY COURT ACT, PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE TRIAL COURT RECORDS AND THE ORDER DATED 01.06.2023 PASSED IN CRL.MISC.NO.92/2022 ON THE FILE OF THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, CHIKKAMAGALURU, BE SET ASIDE AND THE SAID PETITION FILED BY THE RESPONDENTS BE DISMISSED BY ALLOWING THE ABOVE REVISION PETITON WITH COSTS. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI ORAL ORDER The RPFC is of the year 2023. Till now, no steps are taken for issuance of notice to the respondents. 2. When the matter was listed on 18.7.2025, as there was no representation on behalf of both the parties and no notice is served on the respondents, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption for 'dismissal' today. 3. Today also, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, it appears that the petitioner is not interested to pursue the matter. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27664 RPFC No. 206 of 2023 4. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE TL List No.: 1 Sl No.: 71