Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6955 (UTT)

KHALIL AHMAD v. NAGAR NIGAM HARIDWAR

SPA/1018/2017 · 2025-04-22

Ashish Naithani, Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:2894-DB SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS SPA/1018/2017 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J. Mr. Bhuwnesh Joshi, Advocate for the appellant. Ms. Ananya Jain, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Sandeep Kothari, Advocate for the respondent. 2. Mr. Bhuwnesh Joshi, learned counsel appearing for the appellant makes statement at the Bar that the Appeal has become infructuous by afflux of time. 3. Accordingly, the Appeal is dismissed as infructuous. 4. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (Ashish Naithani, J.) (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 22.04.2025 Mahinder/