Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 69541 (KAR)

THE NATIONAL CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., v. SMT. R.S. SHANTHA

CRP/269/2024 · 2025-12-15

V Srishananda

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:53282 CRP No. 269 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 269 OF 2024 (IO) BETWEEN: 1. THE NATIONAL CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., REP. BY ITS MANAGER, NO.73/1, GANDHI BAZAR MAIN ROAD, BASAVANAGUDI, BENGALURU-04. 2. THE AUTHORISED OFFICER THE NATIONAL CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., NO.73/1, GANDHI BAZAR MAIN ROAD, BASAVANAGUDI, BENGALURU-04. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. R.P. SOMASHEKARIAH, ADVOCATE) AND: SMT. R.S. SHANTHA, W/O LATE NARAIMHAIAH, AGED ABOUT 83 YEARS, R/AT NO.56, UPSTAIR, 4TH CROSS, MODANDARAMAPURAM, PRESENTLY KNOWN AS SWIMMING POOL EXT., MALLESHWARAM, BENGALURU-03. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. PRASHANTH U.T, ADVOCATE FOR C/R (CP.780/2024)) THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 115 OF CPC, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 02.01.2024 PASSED ON I.A NO.IV IN O.S.NO.2724/2023 ON THE FILE OF THE 17TH ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU, DISMISSING Digitally signed by MALATESH K C Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:53282 CRP No. 269 of 2024 THE I.A.NO.IV FILED UNDER ORDER 7 RULE 11(a) AND (d) R/W SEC. 151 OF CPC, FOR REJECTION OF PLAINT. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER Case called twice. None present on behalf of the revision petitioners. Counsel for the respondent is present. Even on the last date of hearing there was no representation and in interest of justice, this Court suo motu adjourn the matter to today. The revision petition is challenging the dismissal of the application filed under Order VII Rule 11 of Code of Civil Procedure filed on 30.03.2024. Matter is not yet admitted. 2. Taking note of the consistent absence on behalf of the revision petitioner, revision petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE MR