Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6953 (ORI)

IPSAINA SAHOO v. NIRMAL KUMAR SAHOO

TRP(C)/459/2025 · 2026-07-20

M S Sahoo

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK TRP (C) No.459 of 2025 Ipsaina Sahoo …. Petitioner Mr. Suryakanta Dwibedi, Advocate -versus- Nirmal Kumar Sahoo …. Opp. Party CORAM: JUSTICE MRUGANKA SEKHAR SAHOO Order No. ORDER 20.07.2026 (Hybrid Mode) 02. 1. The petitioner present in person mentioned the matter at the beginning of the day’s proceeding and submitted that she no more wishes to pursue the matter and has filed a memo signed by her which is on record. 2. Perusal of the records indicates that the memo is available marked as Flag-B. The petitioner is explained that when the learned counsel of the petitioner is on record she has to obtain consent to appear on her own. She was explained the niceties of law as recorded herein. 3. When the matter reaches during the day’s proceeding being taken up for orders, it is stated by the learned counsel for the petitioner that as per instructions received from the petitioner, she does not want to pursue the litigation. The learned counsel for the petitioner was requested to put his signature in the memo filed by the petitioner available in Court records. Learned counsel endorsed the memo filed by the petitioner, countersigned by the Court Master. 3. In view of the above discussions and memo dated 15.07.2026 filed by the petitioner, the petition stands disposed of. Copy of this order shall be forwarded by the Registry to the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division)/Senior Civil Judge, Kamakhya Nagar to be kept in the records of C.S. (Mat) No.43 of 2025. (Mruganka Sekhar Sahoo) Judge jyotsna