- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44746 HRRP No. 9 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE M G UMA HOUSE RENT REV. PETITION NO. 9 OF 2024 BETWEEN: SRI KAILASH KUMAR S/O SRI JETHMAL, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/AT COMMERCIAL FLAT NO. 10 EXISTING IN APPAJAPPA SONS BUILDING, NO. 142/143, 144/1 AND 144/2 GROUND FLOOR, BELLI BASAVANNA TEMPLE, STREET MAMULPET BANGALORE - 560053. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. KARAVEERAIAH, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: 1. SRI VIMALCHAND @ VIMAL R KHANTER S/O ROOPCHAND, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, R/AT NO.148, MAMULPET, BANGALORE - 560053. 2. SMT PARVATHI BAI W/O LATE TAGRAJ JI, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/AT COMMERCIAL FLAT NO. 11, EXISTING IN APPAJAPPA SONS BUILDING, NO. 142/143, 144/1 AND 144/2 GROUND FLOOR, BELLI BASVANA TEMPLE, STREET MAMULPET BANGALORE 560053. …RESPONDENTS THIS HRRP IS FILED UNDER SEC.46(1) OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 06.06.2022 PASSED IN HRC Digitally signed by PRASHANTH N V Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44746 HRRP No. 9 of 2024 NO.78/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE CHIEF JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES AND MEMBER, PRL. M.A.C.T BANGALORE, ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED UNDER SEC.27(2)(A) AND (R) OF KARNATAKA RENT ACT 1999. THIS HRRP, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE M G UMA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner is absent. No representation, even when the matter is passed over in the morning session and again called in the afternoon session at 2:30 PM. 2. Order sheet dated 15.10.2025 reads as under: "Learned counsel for the petitioner is absent. There is no representation. The matter is listed before the Court for compliance of the office objections for the fourth time. Office has raised 7 objections. The petition is of the year 2024. I do not find any reason to adjourn the matter. However, to afford final opportunity, as a last chance, list this matter on 05.11.2025." - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44746 HRRP No. 9 of 2024 3. The matter is listed for fifth time for compliance of office objections. Still, there is no progress in the matter. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter. 4. Hence, the petition is dismissed for default i.e., for non-prosecution. Sd/- (M G UMA) JUDGE PNV CT:VS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 2