Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 69519 (KAR)

SRI MUNIYAPPA @ MUNIREDDY v. SMT PUTTAMMA @ GOWRAMMA

RFA/957/2024 · 2025-07-11

Anu Sivaraman, K Manmadha Rao

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25698-DB RFA No. 957 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 957 OF 2024 (PAR) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. MUNIYAPPA @ MUNIREDDY S/O LATE BIDDAIAH SINCE DEAD ON 09.12.2012 (HOWEVER LRS ARE NOT BROUGHT ON RECORD BY THE PLAINTIFF IN THE TRIAL COURT IN O.S. No.694/2010) SMT. PILLAMMA W/O MUNIYAPPA @ MUNI REDDY SINCE DEAD ON 14.07.2017 (HOWEVER LRS ARE NOT BROUGHT ON RECORD BY THE PLAINTIFF IN THE TRIAL COURT O.S.No.694/2010) SRI. VENKATESH @ CHINNAIAH S/O LATE MUNIYAPPA @ MUNIREDDY AGED 54 YEARS 2. SMT. BHARATHI W/O VENKATESH @ CHINNAIAH AGED 43 YEARS 3. MR. RANJITH S/O SRI. VENKATESH @ CHINNAIAH AGED 27 YEARS Digitally signed by CHANNEGOWDA PREMA Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25698-DB RFA No. 957 of 2024 4. SMT. RAKSHITHA D/O VENKATESH @ CHINNAIAH AGED 24 YEARS APPELLANTS No.1 TO 4 ARE R/AT THIGALACHOWDENAHALLI VILLAGE DOMMASASNDRA POST SARJAPUR HOBLI AND VIA ANEKAL TALUK BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT-562 125 …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. MANJUNATH K.S., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. PUTTAMMA @ GOWRAMMA (TRANSPOSED AS DEFENDANT No.9 AS PER ORDER DATED 21.06.2017 D/O MUNIYAPPA @ MUNI REDDY W/O PAPA REDDY AGED 64 YEARS R/AT. KAGGALIPURA VILLAGE HUSKUR POST BOMMASANDRA INDL. AREA VIA SARJAPURA HOBLI ANEKAL TALUK BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT-560 099 2. SMT. RATHNAMMA (TRANSPOSED AS DEFENDANT No.10 AS PER ORDER DATED 21.07.2017) D/O MUNIYAPPA @ MUNI REDDY W/O ADI REDDY AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS R/AT. TIGALACHOWDENAHALLI VILLAGE DOMMASANDRA POST SARJAPURA HOBLI AND VIA ANEKAL TALUK BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT-562 125 - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25698-DB RFA No. 957 of 2024 3. SMT. CHANDRIKA D/O MUNIYAPPA @ MUNIREDDY W/O N. RAVINDRA REDDY AGED 50 YEARS R/AT. MUGALUR VILLAGE AND POST HOSUR CATTLE FARM VIA HOSUR TALUK KRISHNAGIRI DISTRICT TAMIL NADU-635 110 4. SRI. B.G. LAKSHMIPRASANNA S/O GURUVA REDDY AGED 47 YEARS 5. SRI. B.N. BALAKRISHNA S/O NANJA REDDY AGED 45 YEARS RESPONDENTS No.4 AND 5 R/AT DEVARABISANAHALLI VILLAGE BELLANDUR POST, VARTHUR HOBLI CARMELARAM VIA BENGALURU EAST BENGALURU-560 035 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. N. GURUVA REDDY, ADVOCATE FOR C/R3; NOTICE TO R4 & R5 IS DISPENSED WITH V.O.DATED 21.11.2024; R2 IS SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SEC.96 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 01.04.2024 PASSED IN OS No.694/2010 ON THE FILE OF II ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ANEKAL, PARTLY DECREEING THE SUIT FOR PARTITION AND SEPARATE POSSESSION. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25698-DB RFA No. 957 of 2024 ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN) A memo has been filed on 30.06.2025 reporting settlement arrived at between the parties. Therefore, the appellants seek to withdraw the appeal as settled out of the Court. 2. The memo is signed by learned counsel for the appellants as well as the appellants. 3. Memo is accepted. 4. In view of the memo, appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE Sd/- (DR.K.MANMADHA RAO) JUDGE PN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 53