Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6951 (UTT)

UPINDERJIT KHURANA v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/1069/2022 · 2025-06-12

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.1069 of 2022 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Pankaj Miglani, Advocate for the petitioner. 2. Mr. S.C. Dumka, A.G.A. with Ms. S.B. Dobhal, B.H. for the State. 3. There is no representation for respondent no.3. 4. It is contended by counsel for the State, on instructions, that after investigation a final report has been submitted in favour of the petitioner, which is not disputed by counsel for the petitioner. 5. In view of the statement made by counsel for the State, nothing remains to be decided in the writ petition. 6. Accordingly writ petition is closed. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 12.06.2025 SK