HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 20371 of 2025 Court No. - 77 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State has handed over a copy of the instructions, the same is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of State-respondents. 3. By means of the present writ petition, a direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere in peaceful marital/live- in life of petitioners, has been sought. 4. Learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel, on the basis of instructions so received, stated that both none of the petitioners are residing inside the territory of Uttar Pradesh. 5. In view of the above, no cause of action survives for pressing the instant petition preferred at the behest of the petitioners, since the police protection cannot be provided apart from territorial jurisdiction of Uttar Pradesh and as such, the petition stands dismissed. September 11, 2025 #Vik/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Brijesh Kumar Prajapati, Mahesh Kumar, Maheshwari Prasad Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Saurabh Srivastava,J.) Smt Aliska Sonkar And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Other .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VIKRAM GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- VIKRAM GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- VIKRAM GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad