- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39759 WP No.25605 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 09TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.25605 OF 2023 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SMT. P.S SARIKA DEVI W/O SRI. N.S. ANAND, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/AT NO.330, 22ND CROSS, III BLOCK, JAYANAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 011. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. GOUTHAM BABU P.V., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: 1. COMMISSIONER OF POLICE INFANTRY ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. INSPECTOR OF POLICE HALASURU GATE POLICE STATION, N.R. SQUARE, BENGALURU - 560 002. 3. THE OFFICE OF THE BANKING OMBUDSMAN RESERVE BANK OF INDIA, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001. 4. COMMISSIONER OF OFFICE OF KHAJANE KPCL GREEN BUILDING, 6TH FLOOR, BEHIND VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU - 560 001. Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39759 WP No.25605 of 2023 5. GENERAL MANAGER SBI E-PAY, STATE BANK BHAVAN, 16TH FLOOR, MADAM CAMA ROAD, MUMBAI - 400 021. 6. BHIM UPI NO.113, K.H. ROAD, SRINIVAS COLONY, WILSON GARDEN, BENGALURU - 560 027. …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS 5 AND 6 TO PROVIDE THE INFORMATION REGARDING THE NAME, ADDRESS, BANK ACCOUNT NUMBER OF THE PERSON, WHO HAS PAID RS.130/- IN THE NAME OF LATE SRI P.A.SATHYANARAYANA GUPTA WITH CHALLAN REFERENCE NO.CR.0822003000277429, BANK REFERENCE NO.3522064717633, DATED 11TH AUGUST, 2022 TO THE KHAJANE II ACCOUNT OF DEPARTMENT OF STAMPS, GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU VIDE ANNEXURE- A; AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER There is no representation for the petitioner. 2. This petition is of the year-2023 and listed for fourth time for non-compliance of office objections. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39759 WP No.25605 of 2023 3. Despite having been granted sufficient time, learned counsel for the petitioner failed to comply with the office objections. This non-compliance by the petitioner would indicate that the petitioner has no genuine intent to diligently pursue the matter. 4. Accordingly, writ petition stands dismissed for non-compliance of office objections. SD/- (E.S. INDIRESH) JUDGE ARK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 23