IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.60043 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-126 Year-2025 Thana- BEGUSARAI MUFFASIL District- Begusarai ====================================================== 1. Ganga Chaudhari S/O Viso Chaudhari @ Vishnudev Chaudhari R/O Vill.- Rajaura, Ward No.-12, P.S.- Muffasil, Dist.- Begusarai 2. Pappu Chaudhari S/O Viso Chaudhari @ Vishnudev Chaudhari R/O Vill.- Rajaura, Ward No.-12, P.S.- Muffasil, Dist.- Begusarai 3. Mithlesh Chaudhari @ Mithlesh Kumar S/O Pappu Chaudhary R/O Vill.- Rajaura, Ward No.-12, P.S.- Muffasil, Dist.- Begusarai 4. Raju Kumar S/O Pappu Chaudhary R/O Vill.- Rajaura, Ward No.-12, P.S.- Muffasil, Dist.- Begusarai 5. Deepak Kumar @ Deepak Chaudhari S/O Ganga chaudhari @ Ganga Ram Chaudhari R/O Vill.- Rajaura, Ward No.-12, P.S.- Muffasil, Dist.- Begusarai 6. Vinod Kumar S/O Ganga chaudhari @ Ganga Ram Chaudhari R/O Vill.- Rajaura, Ward No.-12, P.S.- Muffasil, Dist.- Begusarai 7. Chandan Kumar @ Chandan Chaudhari S/O Ganga chaudhari @ Ganga Ram Chaudhari R/O Vill.- Rajaura, Ward No.-12, P.S.- Muffasil, Dist.- Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Shubhesh Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Suman Kumari Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 2 15-09-2025 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioners seek bail in anticipation of their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 76, 324(4), 329(4), 118(1), 109(1), 351(2), 3(5) of the B.N.S. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.60043 of 2025(2) dt.15-09-2025 2/3 the petitioner nos.2, 3 and 4 are persons with clean antecedent and petitioner nos.1, 5 and 7 have antecedent of one case and petitioner no.6 has antecedent of two cases and the informant alleges that accused persons assaulted her son Ajay with sharp edged weapon causing injury on head. Further, when her brother in-law went to save them, the accused persons assaulted him thereafter accused persons entered the house along with unknown accused and tried to outrage her modesty and even scattered household articles. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that allegation of assault is not specific. It is next submitted that no doubt, injured has suffered injury, but then, the doctor has opined the injury to be simple in nature which amply demonstrates that accused persons never had any intention of committing a serious occurrence. 5. Learned A.P.P. opposes the anticipatory bail application. 6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners, above-named, in the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.60043 of 2025(2) dt.15-09-2025 3/3 event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, are directed to be released on anticipatory bail on their furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned ACJM-1, Begusarai in connection with Muffasil P. S. Case No.126 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. 7. The application stands allowed. vikash/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T