Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 69490 (CAL)

M/S U. M. AND ANR v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

WPA/15360/2021 · 2025-11-11

Krishna Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

S/L 1 11.11.2025 Court. No. 25 suvayan WPA 15360 of 2021 M/s. U M & Anr. Vs. Union of India & Ors. Mr. Satyam Mukherjee Mr. Purnendu Shekhar Ghosh …for the Petitioners. 1. The communication as filed by the learned counsel for the petitioners be kept with the record. 2. The matter is listed today under the heading “To Be Mentioned” on the prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioners. 3. When the matter is called today, counsel for the petitioners has handed over a communication wherein the petitioners have informed the learned advocate-on- record for the petitioners that the petitioners do not wish to proceed the matter and requested to withdraw the same. 4. In view of the communication, learned counsel for the petitioners prays for withdrawal of the writ application. 5. Considering the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioners and perusing the communication WPA 15360 of 2021 is dismissed as withdrawn. 6. All connected applications, if there be any, are also dismissed. 7. Interim order(s), if there be any, stand hereby vacated. (Krishna Rao, J.)