RAJESH KUMAR S/O CHIDDU SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/2513/2025 · 2025-02-19
Anoop Kumar Dhand
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6949 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6949 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2513/2025 Rajesh Kumar S/o Chiddu Singh, aged about 60 Years, R/o Village Nayawas Post Daulatabad Via Acchnera District Agra, Uttar Pradesh ----Petitioner Versus
1. State of Rajasthan, Through Secretary Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Department, Government of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.)
2. State of Rajasthan, through Secretary School Education Department Jaipur (Raj.)
3. The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parisad Pali
4. The Education Officer, (Elementary) Pali.
5. The Education Officer, Bharatpur ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) :
JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 19/02/2025
1. A limited prayer has been made in this petition for issuing a direction to the respondents to decide the representation submitted by the petitioner for redressal of his grievance.
2. The Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Pawan Meena Versus State of Rajasthan in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1665/2024 decided on 02.02.2024, has held that whenever a representation is submitted by an aggrieved person, it is expected from the authorities concerned to decide the same by passing a reasoned and speaking order.
(2 of 2) [CW-2513/2025]
3. The instant writ petition stands disposed of with direction to the respondents to decide the representation (pending, if any) expeditiously, as early as possible, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.
4. Stay application and all applications (pending, if any) also stand disposed of.
5. Before parting with this order, it is made clear that this Court has not issued any direction/order to the respondents to decide the representation in a particular way. The respondents would be at liberty to decide the same strictly in accordance with law.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Ashu/30