Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6949 (KAR)

SRI SAYADA ABDUL MUNAF S/O ABDUL SATTAR KHAZI v. SRI JAYAKANT S/O SUBHAS NIDAVANI

CRL.RP/100325/2024 · 2025-03-06

V Srishananda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:4328 CRL.RP No. 100325 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.100325 OF 2024 (397(CR.PC)/438(BNSS)) BETWEEN: SRI SAYADA ABDUL MUNAF S/O. ABDUL SATTAR KHAZI, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, RESIDING AT VIVEKANAND NAGAR, OPP. TO SAI MANDIR, GADAG-582102. STATE: KARNATAKA. …PETITIONER (BY SRI S.H. KAZI AND U.G. KATTIMANI, ADVOCATES) AND: SRI JAYAKANT S/O. SUBHAS NIDAVANI, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, RESIDING AT VIJAYNAGAR, HALIYAL APARTMENT, DOOR NO. 1, SHANTI NAGAR, SULLAD ROAD, BEHIND CHURCH, HUBBALLI-580032, STATE: KARNATAKA. …RESPONDENT THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S. 438 R/W. 442 OF BNSS, SEEKING TO CALL FOR THE ENTIRE RECORDS IN CRIMINAL CASE NO.430/2014 (PCR NO. 124/2014) ON THE FILE OF TRIAL COURT OF IV ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE J.M.F.C.II, GADAG AND CRL.A NO.29/2023 ION THE FILE OF I ADDL. PRL. JUDGE FAMILY COURT, GADAG AND TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT, PASSED IN C.C.NO. 430/204 DATED 21.07.2023 ON THE FILE OF IV ADDL.CIVIL JUDGE JMFC II, GADAG CONVICTING THE PETITIONER AND TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT, PASSED IN CRL.APPEAL 29/2023 DATED 02.07.2024 ON THE FILE OF I ADDL.PRL.JUDGE, FAMILY COURT GADAG CONFIRMING THE Digitally signed by V N BADIGER Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:4328 CRL.RP No. 100325 of 2024 JUDGMENT OF CONVICTION IN CC NO.430/2014 FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/SEC. 138 OF NI ACT. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA) None present on behalf of the revision petitioner. After obtaining the interim order, there is no progress in the matter. Process fee is not paid for issuance of notice to the respondent. Accordingly, revision petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (V.SRISHANANDA) JUDGE NAA CT:PA LIST NO.: 2 SL NO.: 8