Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 69485 (PNJ)

GURPREET SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRWP/6261/2025 · 2025-06-12

To Be Nominated

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[120] Gurpreet Singh State of Punjab and others Coram : Present: ROHIT KAPOOR [1] there is a threat to the life and liberty of the petitioner. [2] (Annexure P Police, Gurdaspur [3] [4] official respondents, i.e. respondent Nos.1 to 4, on advance notice and waives service. [5] expressing any opinion of the merits of the averments made by the petitioner, the instant petition is disposed of with respondent No.3 to decide the representation (Annexure P [6] 12.06.2025 ‘R. Sharma' IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-62 Date of Decision : 1 Gurpreet Singh versus State of Punjab and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHIT KAPOOR Mr. Sandeep Arora, Advocate for the petitioner. **** ROHIT KAPOOR, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner there is a threat to the life and liberty of the petitioner. The petitioner has moved (Annexure P-3) to respondent No.3, i.e. Police, Gurdaspur, however, no action has been taken thereupon. Notice of motion. Mr. Ishan Kaushal, AAG, Punjab respondents, i.e. respondent Nos.1 to 4, on advance notice and waives service. Keeping in view the limited prayer made and without expressing any opinion of the merits of the averments made by the petitioner, the instant petition is disposed of with respondent No.3 to decide the representation (Annexure P-3) within a period of one month. Disposed of with the aforesaid terms. .06.2025 Whether speaking/ reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 6261-2025 Date of Decision : 12.06.2025 …Petitioner ….Respondents HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHIT KAPOOR Advocate for the petitioner. (Through V.C. Learned counsel for the petitioner inter alia contends that there is a threat to the life and liberty of the petitioner. has moved representation dated 01.06.2025 , i.e. Senior Superintendent of no action has been taken thereupon. Mr. Ishan Kaushal, AAG, Punjab, appears on behalf of the respondents, i.e. respondent Nos.1 to 4, on advance notice and Keeping in view the limited prayer made and without expressing any opinion of the merits of the averments made by the petitioner, the instant petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3 to decide the representation dated 01.06.2025 within a period of one month. Disposed of with the aforesaid terms. (ROHIT KAPOOR) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No Through V.C.) contends that representation dated 01.06.2025 Senior Superintendent of , appears on behalf of the respondents, i.e. respondent Nos.1 to 4, on advance notice and Keeping in view the limited prayer made and without expressing any opinion of the merits of the averments made by the a direction to dated 01.06.2025 RAJNEESH SHARMA 2025.06.12 19:30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document