Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 69482 (ALL)

SURESH SONI v. STATE OF U.P THROUGH ITS SECRETARY HOME U.P AT LUCKNOW

BAIL/22484/2025 · 2025-09-18

Krishan Pahal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 22484 of 2025 Court No. - 67 HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J. 1. List has been revised. 2. Heard Sri Pushpendra Singh, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Arun Kumar Mishra, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record. 3. By means of the present bail application, the applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No.0435 of 2025, under Sections 2/3 of U.P. Gangster and Anti- Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Police Station- Khurja Nagar, District- Bulandshahr, during the pendency of trial. 4. It is argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the prosecution under the Gangsters Act have been launched against the applicant on the basis of three criminal cases shown in the gang chart in which he has already been enlarged on bail by the court concerned. The details of criminal cases have been mentioned in the affidavit accompanying the bail application. He has been falsely implicated in the present case due to police rivalry. He is not the member of any gang. The criminal history of four cases assigned to the applicant stands explained. The applicant is languishing in jail since 28.05.2025. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail. 5. On the other hand, learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail. 6. Without expressing any opinion on the merits, the bail application is Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Pushpendra Singh, Rukmani Ojha Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Suresh Soni .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P Through Its Secretary Home U.P At Lucknow .....Opposite Party(s) allowed. Let the applicant- Suresh Soni, involved in aforementioned case be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions that :- (i) The applicant shall not tamper with evidence during trial. (ii) The applicant shall not pressurise/intimidate with the prosecution witnesses. (iii) The applicant shall appear before the trial court on the date fixed. 7. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted. September 19, 2025 (Ravi Kant) BAIL No. 22484 of 2025 2 (Krishan Pahal,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAVI KANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- RAVI KANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad