AGRICULTURAL PRODUCERS MARKETING COMMITTEE v. M L KARTHIK
RSA/1343/2022 · 2025-09-24
V Srishananda
Original Suitbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 69473 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 69473 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:38488 RSA No. 1343 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1343 OF 2022 (MON) BETWEEN:
AGRICULTURAL PRODUCERS MARKETING COMMITTEE BANDIPALYA, MYSORE 570010 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. SWAROOP T, ADVOCATE) AND:
M L KARTHIK AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, S/O M LAKSHMISHEKHAR R/O NO 9 C-2 LAKSHMI NIVAS MANANDAVADI MAIN ROAD NEAR RAILWAY WORKSHOP FORT MOHALLA MYSORE SOUTH MYSORE - 570 004. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. SHARATH GOWDA G B.,ADVOCATE)
THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 23.12.2020 PASSED IN RA.NO.174/2017 ON THE FILE OF THE V ADDL.
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSURU. DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 16.03.2017 PASSED IN O.S.NO.63/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, MYSURU.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
Digitally signed by CHANDANA B M Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:38488 RSA No. 1343 of 2022
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA
ORAL JUDGMENT
Authorized officer of the appellant is present. Respondent is present with his counsel.
2. They present a compromise petition under
Order XXIII Rule 3 Code of Civil Procedure signed by the parties and their respective advocates.
3. Parties agree that the terms of the compromise petition depict the true terms of settlement and there is no force, undue influence or coercion in reaching out the terms of the compromise petition. They also submit that on their own volition, they have signed the compromise petition.
4. As such, there is no impediment for this Court to accept the compromise petition and dispose of the appeal in terms of the compromise petition. Hence, the following:
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:38488 RSA No. 1343 of 2022
ORDER i) Appeal is allowed in terms of the compromise petition. ii) Office is directed to issue the modified decree in terms of the compromise petition appending the copy of the compromise petition as part of the decree. iii) Refund of permissible Court Fee is allowed.
Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE
MDS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8