Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 69446 (KAR)

MUNIRAJAPPA @ MUNIRAJU. N v. TATA AIG GEN. INS. CO. LTD.,

MFA/1406/2023 · 2025-09-10

Lalitha Kanneganti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:37221 MFA No. 1406 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.1406 OF 2023(MV-I) BETWEEN: MUNIRAJAPPA @ MUNIRAJU. N, S/O. NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/AT KAGGALAHALLI VILLAGE, BUDIRERE POST, DEVANAHALLI TALUK, BENGALURU-562129. ...APPELLANT (BY SRI. P. SURESH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. TATA AIG GEN. INS. CO. LTD., BANGALORE REGIONAL OFFICE, 2ND FLOOR, JP AND DEVI, JAMBUKESHWARA ARCADE, NO.69, MILLERS ROAD, BENGALURU-560052. (REP.BY ITS INCHARGE MANAGER). 2. SRI K.S. VASAVI PRASAD, MAJOR IN AGE, Digitally signed by MEGHA MOHAN Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:37221 MFA No. 1406 of 2023 R/AT 4TH 'D' CROSS, 3RD MAIN 'A' ROAD, 3RD BLOCK,HRBR LAYOUT, BENGALURU-560045. 3. SRI ANAND KUMAR, S/O. FRANCIS, MAJOR IN AGE, R/AT NO.21,OIL MILL ROAD, L.R. PURAM STREET, THOMAS TOWN, BENGALURU-560084. ...RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. S V HEGDE MULKHAND.,ADVOCATE FOR R1; V/O/DATED 28.02.2023 NOTICE TO R2 AND 3 DISPENSED WITH) THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 02.09.2021 PASSED IN MVC NO.3928/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDITIONAL SMALL CAUSES JUDGE AND MACT, BENGALURU SCCH-11, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:37221 MFA No. 1406 of 2023 ORAL JUDGMENT When this matter came up on 11.07.2025, as there was no representation on behalf of the appellant, the matter was directed to be listed on 07.08.2025. On 07.08.2025, the matter was directed to be listed on 14.08.2025. On 14.08.2025, it was directed to be listed under the caption as “part heard”. On 19.08.2025, as there was no representation on behalf of the appellant, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption for “dismissal” on 10.09.2025. 2. Today also, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant. It appears that the appellant is not interested to pursue the matter. 3. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non- prosecution. SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE BN List No.: 3 Sl No.: 2