Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:115077 Court No. - 68 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 22710 of 2025 Applicant :- Sikander Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Rakesh Kumar Garg,Yash Garg Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J.
1. Heard Sri Yash Garg, learned counsel for the applicant as well as the Sri Ramesh Kumar, learned AGA for the State and perused the material placed on record.
2. The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No. 162 of 2025, under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 109(1) of B.N.S., Police Station- Rasulpur, District- Firozabad during pendency of trial.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that only one grievous injury has been found on the head of the injured. It cannot be said by whom out of 6 implicated, the injury has been caused. The applicant has been falsely implicated in this case. He has no criminal history to his credit and is languishing in jail since
25.05.2025. The trial in the aforesaid case is not likely to be concluded in near future. It is further submitted that co-accused Raman, Kailash and Tushar have already been granted bail by co- ordinate Bench of this Court vide orders dated 23.06.2023, 25.06.2025 and 02.07.2025 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application Nos.19958 of 2025, 21861 of 2025 and 21868 of
2025. Therefore, the applicant is also entitled to be released on bail on the ground of parity with the co-accused. Charge sheet has already been filed, therefore, there is no requirement of custodial interrogation. In case, he is granted bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and would cooperate in the trial proceedings.
4. On the other hand, learned A.G.A. for the State opposed the prayer for bail, but he could not dispute the aforesaid fact.
5. Thus, considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case,
submissions of learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view
the nature of offence, evidence, complicity of accused and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail.
6. Let the applicant- Sikander, involved in the aforementioned crime be released on bail, on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned, with the following conditions:- i. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the
facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. ii. The applicant shall cooperate in the trial/investigation sincerely without seeking any adjournment. iii. The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail. iv. The applicant shall attend in accordance with the conditions of the bond executed by him.
7. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.
8. Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted.
Order Date :- 15.7.2025 PS Digitally signed by :- POOJA SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad