1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 14 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 387 OF 2019 MOHAN S/O. SHRIPATI SATHE VERSUS NANDKISHOR T. JOREWAR AND OTHERS ... Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Vishal Vikram Ghansawdh h/f. Mr. Thorat Mohanish V. APP for Respondent/State : Mr. V. M.Lomte … CORAM : SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR J., DATE : 15.12.2025 PER COURT : 1. At the outset, learned counsel for petitioner submits vide order 08.12.2025, inadvertently, the name of advocate for the appellant is mentioned as ‘Ghansawal’, which should be ‘Ghansawadh’. 2. In view of the above, necessary corrections be carried out accordingly. 3. Mr. Vishal Vikram Ghansawadh learned counsel holding for Advocate Mr.Thorat, on behalf of petitioner states that the matter has become infructuous. 4. Hence writ petition is disposed of as infructuous. ( SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR ) JUDGE shp