APHC010067232019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3368] WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 3061/2019 Between: 1. R K MISRO, S/O GOVINDA MISRA, AGED 54 YEARS, OCC ADVOCATE, R/O. D NO. 10-12-7/20, REDNELLA APARTMENTS, REDNAM GARDENS, VISHAKAPATNAM ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP, BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, MANDASA P.S., MANDASA, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, O/O THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PALASA, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 4. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, O/O THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G MALLIKHARJUNA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: 2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO.3061 OF 2019 ORDER: This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed for the following relief: “….to issue order or orders more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the inaction of the Respondent No.2 and 3 herein in not registering the crime based on the petitioner's information and complaint dated 03.09.2018 in the nature of cognizable offence and investigate the said crime as being illegal, arbitrary, against the law and violation of Article 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India also violation of Lalitha Kumari Judgment, consequently it is further prayed to direct the Respondent no. 1 to initiate departmental and disciplinary enquiry proceedings against the Respondent No.2 & 3 for violation of Lalitha Kumari Judgment & Criminal Procedure code and pass…” 2. Learned Additional Government Pleader for Home is in attendance. 3. None appeared for the petitioner either physically or through V.C., though the matter is posted under the caption for dismissal. There was no representation for the petitioner today, as well as on the previous adjournment. 3 4. In that view of the matter, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 08.01.2025. Pmk 4 7 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO:3061 of 2019 Date:08.01.2025 Pmk