Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 69436 (BOM)

INDIRA SHIKSHAN VA KRIDA PRASARAK MANDAL ADUL v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

CP/51/2014 · 2025-12-01

Shri Arun R Pedneker

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 36 CONT. PETITION NO. 50 OF 2014 IN WP/1062/2011 CHAOUNDESHWARI SEVABHAVI SANSTHA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ... 37 CONT. PETITION NO. 51 OF 2014 IN WP/1061/2011 INDIRA SHIKSHAN VA KRIDA PRASARAK MANDAL ADUL VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ... 38 CONT. PETITION NO. 52 OF 2014 IN WP/7472/2010 SHRI. SADGURU SHIKSHAN PRASARAK MANDAL THROUGH PRESIDENT VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ... 39 CONT. PETITION NO. 53 OF 2014 IN WP/1553/2011 KONARK SEVABHAVI SANSTHA, HINGOLI VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ... Advocate for the Petitioners : Mr. R.K. Ashtekar h/f. Mr. Rudrawar S.G. AGP for Respondents/State : Mr. V.K. Kotecha ... CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. Dated : December 01, 2025 PER COURT :- 1. The learned counsel Mr. R.K. Ashtekar holding for Mr. S.G. Rudrawar, learned advocate for the petitioners submits that due to passage of time, the contempt petitions are rendered infructuous as inquiry contemplated under the Contempt of Courts Act is not feasible. 2. Considering his submissions, the contempt petitions are disposed off. ( ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. ) ssc/