- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29623 WP No. 55386 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN WRIT PETITION NO.55386 OF 2018 (LB-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. RAVI D'LIMA S/O SEBESTIAN D'LIMA, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/AT D'LIMA COMPLEX, THENKJABETTU POST, K.G. ROAD, UPPOOR VILLAGE, UDUPI TALUK, UDUPI DISTRICT-576 105. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. HAREESH BHANDARY T., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER UDUPI DISTRICT, RAJATHADRI, MANIPAL, UDUPI-576 101. 2. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER UDUPI ZILLA PANCHAYATH, UDUPI-576 101. 3. CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER UDUPI TALUK PANCHAYATH, UDUPI TALUK, UDUPI-576 101. Digitally signed by GEETHA P G Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29623 WP No. 55386 of 2018 4. THE UPPOOR GRAMA PANCHAYATH UPPOOR VILLAGE, UDUPI TALUK AND DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS PANCHAYATH DEVELOPMENT OFFICER-576 105. 5. THE JOTHSNA CHARITABLE TRUST NAGARAJIDDA, UPPOOR VILLAGE, TENKABETTU POST, UDUPI TALUK AND DISTRICT-576 105. BY ITS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE LESSLI LOUIS. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. BOPANNA BELLIAPPA, AGA FOR R.1; SRI ASHOK N. NAIK, ADVOCATE FOR R.3; SRI HARSHA G., ADVOCATE FOR SRI SACHIN B.S., ADVOCATE FOR R.4; SRI VASANTHAPPA, ADVOCATE FOR R.5; R.2: SERVED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO.1 TO TAKE NECESSARY ACTION AGAINST THE RESPONDENT NO.5 PURSUANT TO THE COMMUNICATED BEARING NO.U.GRAMA PANCHAYATH NO.129/2017-2018 ANNEXURE-A DATED 18.07.2017 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.4., ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THROUGH PHYSICAL HEARING/VIDEO CONFERENCING THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29623 WP No. 55386 of 2018 ORAL ORDER 1. The petitioner, aggrieved by the fifth respondent running an old age home at Nagarajidda, Uppoor Village, Udupi Taluk, without due authorization, gave a representation to respondent No.1 to initiate action. As the same has not been considered, the present writ petition is filed with a prayer to direct respondent No.1 to initiate action against respondent No.5. 2. The counsel for respondent No.5 submits that the old age home has now closed in the light of the land having been acquired by the State. The said aspect is not disputed by any of the parties. 3. For the aforementioned reasons, the writ petition is hereby dismissed as having become infructuous. SD/- (M.I.ARUN) JUDGE VMB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 61