Sunni Kumar Sakshi @ Mukesh Yadav v. The State of Bihar
/57372/2025 · 2025-09-02
Prabhat Kumar Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 69422 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 69422 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57372 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-90 Year-2025 Thana- SAHEBPUR KAMAL District- Begusarai ====================================================== Sunni Kumar Sakshi @ Mukesh Yadav S/o- Bajo Yadav Village- Chauki Ps- Sahebpur Kamal Dist-Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rananjay Kumar, Advocate Mr. Kumar Binode Bariar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Ms. Anita Kumari, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 02-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.
2. Petitioner apprehends arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 352, 351(1), 351(2), 109(1), 303(2), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.
3. As per F.I.R., on 27.03.2025 at about 7 PM, when informant was returning after harvesting his wheat crop, all the F.I.R. named accused persons assaulted him. This petitioner is alleged to have assaulted informant with butt of pistol.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. There is no specific accusation of overt act against the petitioner. F.I.R. has been lodged after inordinate delay of nine days which itself
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57372 of 2025(2) dt.02-09-2025 2/2 raises doubt over veracity of the prosecution case. Petitioner claims clean antecedent.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposed the bail application.
6. Considering the nature of accusation, delay in lodging the F.I.R. and clean antecedent, this anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that let the above named petitioner in the event of his arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub Judge- IV-cum-ACJM-IV, Begusarai in connection with Sahebpur Kamal P. S. Case No. 90 of 2025, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
Navya/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T